Ultimate magazine theme for WordPress.

How will the palace respond to Prince Harry?


“Dear, oh my dear,” the King said as he greeted Liz Truss during one of his final audiences at Buckingham Palace before his ill-fated time as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom came to an end. He may have responded well with similar sentiments – or perhaps with stronger language – considering everything his youngest son has had to say in six hours of Netflix, three great TV interviews and a book of 407 pages.

Prince Harry has made it clear that he feels his family owes him and Meghan an apology and has repeatedly said the “ball is in their court” while referring to the need for “accountability”. there must be reconciliation in the family. At the same time, Harry has expressed a desire to be reunited with his family, in particular his father and brother, but it would appear that the royal family has little reason to feel confident communicating with him, including through letters. and SMS, which could end. released.

After so much preparation for the release of the ‘Spare’ book over the past few months, all eyes and ears are now on Buckingham and Kensington Palaces for any official or unofficial reaction from the King or Prince of Wales. , Harry ‘s brother . While official communications offices supporting the Royal Family have maintained a studious silence, those close to the Royal Family and various sources have said there is great pain, sadness and mistrust on the part of the King and his heir. .

Trust, if it existed before Netflix and the release of ‘Spare’, has completely disappeared, although Harry said future conversations will be based on trust and confidentiality. Given that Prince Harry has a four-book deal, there will be concerns about what might be released or said in future interviews.

Palaces have always maintained a policy of not making official comments on matters within the family unless absolutely necessary. In 2020, the inflammatory nature of a racism allegation was a necessary exception, although that accusation was denied by Harry on ITV.

Although this is a new reign with a different king and communications from the palace have taken a more effusive and emotional turn than the late queen could have allowed, it is hard to see how the royal family can respond to the allegations made. Harry’s side of the story is a perspective they clearly don’t share, and their memories are very likely to vary significantly from the view in Montecito, California.


The king will be particularly upset by comments describing the queen consort as “dangerous because of the links she was forging in the British press”, which would lead to “bodies left in the street”. There may not be a comeback without an apology – from Harry. Prince William will be particularly upset about the toxic sibling rivalry he has with his brother and their private arguments that have been aired, including with the Duchess of Cambridge.

While William may be angry at this invasion of privacy, perhaps it’s time for the family to reflect on how these misunderstandings and disputes developed, and whether the competition in the desire for positive media coverage led to overzealousness on the part of the staff.

The British media subjected various claims and stories in the “documentary series” and autobiography to extensive fact-checking. The Palace will be content, for the most part, to leave it to the media to point out inconsistencies, hypocritical comments, as well as outright factual inaccuracy. Harry’s own anger at invasions of his privacy and stories having been ‘leaked’ or ‘planted’ in the media by family members and staff with their agendas hasn’t stopped him from doing this to members. closest to his family.

Many details in the book are questioned where the sequence of events, settings, or context are off the mark.

The Palace has traditionally considered that answering some stories, and not others, suggests that unanswered ones may be true. Thus, by not responding to any, he acts coherently and tries to stay above the tumult of fabricated scandals and interpersonal conflicts. The extent of disclosure of conversations, texts and discussions, behind-the-scenes stories, as well as information that appears to be of more lewd interest goes well beyond what could be considered private. This leaves the Palace in a position where they simply would not want to get involved in the line of fire.

Any statement will likely draw a response from the Sussexes, including those in the media who seem to speak for them, and that will keep the story in the media for longer. There is every incentive to end the damage as soon as possible, given the impending events of the year as the Royals return to public duty after the Christmas and New Year holidays. And the coronation is looming.

There are many major aspects of the coronation, which are not yet public. These include the extent of public participation, other events that will take place during the coronation weekend, whether the oaths will be revised to reflect more contemporary times and how the ceremony will be shortened compared to 1953. One of the big problems will also be the guest list. While in 1953 more than 8,000 were present, this time there will be only 2,000 as many as at the funeral of the late queen.

This weekend, the palace made it known that four living royal dukes (including Harry and Andrew) will not pay their respects during the ceremony as they would have done in the past. In May, this will be interpreted only by Prince William, as Prince of Wales and Duke of Cornwall and Cambridge. It’s surely no coincidence that this information found its way into the media as the leaked excerpts from “Spare” added fuel to the fire. Expect more Coronation details in the coming days and weeks to change the discussion.


While Harry said the ball is in his family’s court – for most observers it seems clear the ball will be in Sussex court as to how to respond to a coronation invitation where they won’t have no formal role, and where it could be a chilly reception from the royal family let alone crowds. Public opinion of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex has steadily waned in the UK over the past few months due to Netflix’s “docuseries” and this far more provocative book.

The King and Prince William and their wives have a lot to do as the new reign takes shape and Prince William establishes himself as Prince of Wales, following his father. There are visits and trips abroad through a very disunited UK, Commonwealth issues and symbols of the new reign to consider. As a result, a “keep calm and carry on” approach is likely to be the watchword rather than a war of words and memories, at least while the hurtful words are fresh.

The friction within the family has now been laid bare for all to see, and there’s probably a sense that enough has been said, and the king and his heir will want to move on to each other. focus on their core responsibilities in these times of great public concern. on the cost of living, the situation in Ukraine and environmental disasters. For the Royal Family, actions invariably speak louder than words. The last thing the King or Prince of Wales wants is to get involved in a soap opera that runs as if it were a reality TV show.

While Harry mocked Britain’s ‘never apologise, never explain’ approach, this is how the family is moving forward to weather this storm, at least in public. A more likely outcome will be forgiveness and redemption over a long period of time, healing some wounds. It is this approach, rooted in Christianity, that the King, as a person of faith and as Harry’s father, can follow to find his way through this public and dramatic rift in a family seeking to be united. and to represent the best in public. life.

If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – at itipspedia@gmail.com The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.